
T-urn?

Five for four for the price of three for two for one





Beaten generation

Tossed off

It was pointed out to me (after this one appeared in the paper) that her right hand is on back to front.
Is this a rare occurrence of bad anatomical rendering, or are there others lurking in the archives? You tell us. And before you ask, godzillas do have nostrils on the end of their . . . beak things.
Poultry excuse

This includes the international standard signifier of old people: high pants PW
The short arm of the law

Cod psychology

Late knight shopping


Free radicals

It's been in the family for over 35 minutes



Art is anal


Long slow comfortable screw against the wall

The daily rind

Liquid lunch

Seating arrangement

Devoid of eastern promise

I think this may have foxed a few people. It plays on the trope that if a chinese/indian restaurant is frequented by diners of same ethnic origin, the food is probably authentic. We struggled with it for a bit, because our original idea seemed to run the risk of appearing slightly racist. Somehow the flip-side, that if the diners weren't chinese then the food wouldn't be any good, seemed to avoid this mis-interpretation - but the joke may have been compromised slightly. Here's the original for comparison. We were probably being over-sensitive - hand-wringing Guardianistas that we are.

Soft sell

Under the knife


Grand Larsony

Oops.
Cartoon jokes come in all varieties, and sometimes when coming up with ideas, we hit on one that feels like the style of joke a particular cartoonist would do - this idea is a little bit Charles Addams, that one has a bit of a Sempé vibe to it, etc.
I can't remember if we had that conversation when we came up with the idea for Harry, but it turns out it was more than a little bit Gary Larson.

We're huge Larson fans, and had we known he'd done a similar cartoon already we would have gone straight back to the drawing board, no question - there's no satisfacation in recyling an idea that's already been conceived. But this was a cartoon neither of us was aware of until someone tweeted it this morning with the suggestion that we'd ripped Larson off.
The great man's output was something like 5,500 cartoons, so I'm sure he'd understand that this one had slipped by the both of us!